Today’s leadership post comes from Changing on the Job: Developing Leaders for a Complex World by Jennifer Berger. I love how Berger (2012) utilized her explanation of Robert Kegan’s subject-object theory to emphasize the importance of knowing how we know what we know.

In my own development, I find it difficult to move things from subject to object because it’s nearly impossible to see what is subject to me until I’m made aware of it. The movement of things from “subject” to “object” is one way that leadership transformation can happen. Berger (2012) explains it best in her appendix on Key Concepts in Adult Development.

Subject: Things that are subject are by definition experienced as unquestioned,
simply a part of the self. They can include many different things—a relational issue, a personality trait, an assumption about the way the world works, behaviors, or emotions. Things that are subject to you can’t be seen because they are a part of you. Because they can’t be seen, they are taken for granted, taken for true—or not even taken at all. You generally can’t name things that are “subject,” and you certainly can’t reflect upon them—that would require the ability to stand back and take a look at them. You don’t have something that’s subject; something that’s subject has you. For example, I once thought that all people learn things in basically the same way—the way I learned them. When students came to me with difficulty about an assignment or test, I thought the problem was theirs; I was being so clear and they were still not learning. I struggled and struggled to help them learn, but to no avail. I was subject to my own teaching and learning styles. I didn’t know different styles existed (because I figured everyone taught and learned like me), so I was powerless to change my style to meet the needs of diverse learners.

Object: Object is the opposite of subject. Again, something that is object can be a relational issue, personality trait, or a belief about the world. While things that are subject have you, you have things that are object. While all of us necessarily have many parts of our world to which we are subject (if we gave much conscious thought to our assumptions about gravity, we might not have time to go to sleep at night!), one part of development is about moving more and more things from subject to object. The more in your life you take as object, the more complex your worldview because you can see and act upon more things. In the example above, as I struggled to help my students learn, I found out about teaching and learning styles – especially as they relate to personality type. For the first time I could examine something I hadn’t even known existed before – my own teaching and learning styles and I could take action to help my students be more successful. What was once unknown and unnamed – subject – became within my ability to reflect on – as object. The most profound example of a move from subject to object is when the entire meaning-making system moves from that which unquestioningly runs me to that which I can actively take charge of and control. This shift of entire systems is what gives form to the five forms of mind.

Soak Game Table Talk

My takeaway from Kegan’s subject-object theory and Berger’s example is that it is not about what we know but how we know what we know. Focusing on the what can be really deceiving. If how we know needs to change, we need more than information; we need transformation. This is important to recognize in leadership because it can significantly impact the way one makes decisions, the way a leader utilizes their influence, and an individuals capacity to reach the next form of mind or developmental stage (maybe we’ll touch on this next week).

If you put a cap on your own learning by staying in an expert action-logic developmental stage – the “I wouldn’t be here if I didn’t know what I was doing” syndrome: you arrest not just your leadership development, but also your human development. Development is not about seeing who can get to the next stage the fastest. I promise you no one pats you on the back or gives you a two-week vacation to the Bahamas or shine in the Guiness Book of World Records for being the most self-transformational human being. Development is a choice. Leadership capacity is inevitable once the choice to develop is made.

Do you recall any moments in your life when things shifted from subject to object?

References

Berger, J. G. (2012) Appendix A: Key concepts in adult development. In Changing on the job: developing leaders for a complex world. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Visit the About page to see how to get instant access to leadership tips, peer-reviewed insight, inside scoop on fun things-to-do, and to participate in giveaway contests – for free.

Disclosure

Advertisements

Creating a Solid Unit of Performance

     Three levels of an organization exist that are interdependent of one another: the organization level, group (or team) level, and individual level. Figure 1 displays a top down model where the design components at each level serve as the inputs to the next level. For example, any changes made at the group level would likely create a need for changes at the individual level. This is because the design components of each level (the middle box at each level in Figure 1) directly feed into the inputs at the next lower level. Thus, each lower level is interdependent of the next higher level. We will be zooming in on the group level; however, it is critical to begin with this model of how each level impacts the next lower level to further gain a holistic understanding of why competency in group theory is important when developing a high-performance team. “The key to effective diagnosis is knowing what to look for at each level as well as how the levels affect each other” (Cummings & Worley, 2015, p. 94). Let’s take a closer look at the design components at the group level while drawing upon concepts from Joining Together: Group Theory and Group Skills by David Johnson and Frank Johnson. (more…)

Abstract

This article seeks to determine if the statement “to doubt truthfulness of a rightful authority means that a person is being disrespectful” (Facione, 2013, p. 128) is accurate and any fallacies associated with the statement. An objective analysis of the statement is broken down visually via an argument map. And followed by an evaluation of whether or not the argument fails. The article concludes with the broader consequences of the statement in question and the author’s recommendations. (more…)

Abstract

This article defines the four major frames developed by behavioral scientist, Dr. Lee G. Bolman and social scientist, Dr. Terrence E. Deal, and provides an analysis of how government agencies at the local level operate within each frame. The article draws upon literature about reframing organizations and utilizes examples from both American history and mock scenarios. I define “The Struggle” as the experience civil service workers undergo in terms of upward mobility in government and its impact on service quality to the public. Followed by proposing a focused evaluation on the frames from which government operates from (structural, human resource, political, and symbolic) to work with union negotiators on a redesign of the system.

(more…)

Abstract

This article provides a reflection of my analysis of a toxic leader. The article draws upon literature about ethics in leadership and is based on my personal experience with a dysfunctional leader. I define “The Game” as the manipulation that a toxic leader utilizes to sustain leverage and get their way. Followed by proposing a simple remedy, don’t play with the game. (more…)

Abstract

This article focuses primarily on scholarly research conducted to draw conclusions on the correlation between the on-demand culture and the way businesses brand and market themselves. It begins with an introduction to the research question followed by a definition of on-demand culture. Peer-reviewed reports on impulse purchasing behavior and brand attitude are also discussed in support of the conclusion.  (more…)

Let me start by saying, I do not paint professionally nor did I attend an Art Institute. So nope, I am definitely not a Pablo Picasso. I don’t even know much about proper painting techniques. I simply have an appreciation for art and I thought it would be cool to do an acrylic painting of La Jolla Cove as part of a birthday gift for one of my best friends. So if you’re a rookie like me or just equally love art in general, this post is to show you how I managed to complete this painting of La Jolla Cove. (more…)